Germany and England [Nesta H. Webster] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Computer enhanced reprint of the edition. Germany and England is a little known pamphlet By Nesta Webster, The small book is about Germany under National Socialism, and specifically it’s. Germany and England has 2 ratings and 0 reviews. Germany and England is a little known pamphlet By Nesta Webster, The small book.
|Published (Last):||15 August 2006|
|PDF File Size:||19.55 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Search the history of over billion web pages on the Internet. Nesta Webster Prefatory comments by Jackie P. THIS is the little book that opened my eyes about the mass of massive lies we’ve all been told about Germany under National Socialism, and specifically it’s Chancellor, Adolf Hitler. To my mind the greatest lie was that “Adolf Hitler planned to conquer the world and enslave the inhabitants of all nesa. In reality the ones making those accusations are the ones who plan to conquer the world.
The defeat of Germany was a defeat for all the inhabitants of the world, just as Adolf Hitler predicted. In another small book titled. The Nameless WarCaptain A. Ramsay gives convincing evidence of the above statement. For some of our readers this will be a turning point as it was for me. The more lies you uncover, the more truth you desire.
Those of you who would rather remain nexta ignorant will leave now. Those of you who know the truth and hate the truth will be frothing at the mouth that the lies are being exposed. Captain Ramsay was a veteran of the first World War, a former member of His Majesty’s Guard, and — at the time of his arrest and imprisonment — a member of the British Parliament.
Germany and England
He was arrested without formal charges and thrown into Brixton Prison for nearly three years because he discovered and attempted to reveal the culprits who were clamoring for, orchestrating and promulgating what became the Second World War.
Nobody wanted war in England or Germany except Winston Churchill and the War Hawks who controlled him and the press just like in the U. When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned from a trip to Germany where he had entered into one-on-one conversations with Chancellor Hitler, he announced to the Parliament and webater British people that “there will be no war”. Behind the exuberant celebrations of the people in both Germany and England, the planners went to work. Inside of one week, the controlled press was printing lies about the Prime Minister and began clamoring for his resignation.
He was blamed ndsta a military blunder that had actually been committed under Churchill’s orders as Admiral of the Navy. Instead of Churchill standing accused, it was Nedta.
Chamberlain was out; Churchill was in, and on the very evening of the day Churchill became Prime Minister May 11,England began indiscriminate bombing of Germany. The situation is the same now as it was then, and the same unseen hand at work today is the same force behind every revolution and war carried out since time immemorial.
Rand the foiled thanks to Mussolini and Hitler Spanish revolution which Mrs. Webster relates in this book. Germany and England was presented to me by a friend in her senior years, along with several boxes of books she had been accumulating over the past four decades.
As I sat reading this book, in the privacy of my home, I was silently and sometimes audibly gasping in shock at the revelations herein. Webster’s reference to the ‘Jews’ who controlled the U.
Until that time, englamd information sent or given to me about the Jews, was set aside without a glance, believing that the givers of this information were ‘Jew haters’. And I’m not today. However, there is no denying that the plan for World Dominion is a millenia-old plan, and those born into the ‘religion’ of Talmudism they call themselves Jews are being used by their Elders to push the plan — along with tens of millions of ” Christian-Zionists “.
The word ‘religion’ is emphasized, because Judaism is not a religion, according to Moses Mendelsohn, a learned Jew well-known and respected by Jews. Andd researching and writing the book-in-progress titled ” Jewish Persecution “, it became clear that Mendelsohn meant what he said, and it is true. There is no such religion as Judaism anyway; the religion is ‘Talmudism’ anf ‘Pharisaism’. Webster’s comments about and quoted statements by Adolf Hitler presented an absolutely shocking portrait of an individual whose words – – and more importantly, his actions — spoke volumes for his love of Germany and her people, as well as his abhorrence for the Jews who had spoiled Germany mentally, emotionally and morally, while totally devastating the economy and well-being of the German population.
They controlled the banks economythe government, education, the gerkany, and entertainment just like today in America. Unfortunately, their ‘lesser brethren’ Jews were always the brunt of the machinations of their Elders, as told by Benjamin Freedman in his speech englans a group of people in the late ‘s.
Germany and England by Nesta Webster (Paperback) – Lulu
When you wsbster that speechif you haven’t already, you see parts of it could have been a speech made fairly recently. The historical preview given at the beginning of the first chapter was confusing and little understood by me on the first reading.
That is because I had NO knowledge or understanding of the history of the meddlesome creatures who call themselves Jews, and who have succeeded in infiltrating every government and nation that has ultimately been enhland by their machinations. If the reader takes a look at the names and backgrounds of individuals in very high places in the U. Not only that, they are advisors, speech-writers, nseta so forth, to non-Jews in high places.
If our reader is in the beginning stages of awakening to the lies, it may be helpful to return to the beginning of chapter one for a re-read after finishing the book.
That may be totally unnecessary and maybe I only suggest it because I realized on the second enngland that I had not fully understood those first few pages of pre-history review the first time ’round. We present Germany and England weebster your reading with deep gratitude to Karen A. The book from which this aand transcribed showed no publication date.
It was apparently taken from the paper or newsletter Mrs. Nester published, titled “The Patriot” as referenced below the title. In this writing she alluded to the “England of Just before sending this to our webmaster and he IS a “master” webmasterDarren Weeks, we received a forward from a BBC item on the death of a Lord Shawcross, who led the British prosecution at the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal.
The following statement attributed to Shawcross is relevant and confirms the information Mrs. Webster presents in Germany and England. We have not seen the speech given at Stourbridge. If germahy reader has access to the entire speech we would appreciate notification. July 28th, Sir Hartley Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16, “Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of communism in Europe are sinister and fatal.
Germany and England by Nesta H. Webster
I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we [England] declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the ‘Americans’ around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler’s pleading, not to enter into war.
Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co- operation of Germany: I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentlessly pursued now, only under a different label.
Herr Hitler in October, [said]: This kind of pro-Germanism was of long standing. It was even suggested that Lord Roberts should be deprived of his pension for conducting his campaign for National Service. The Day — when it at last arrived — was hailed with rapture by the German people.
The women threw their hats into the air with joy and the Daily Mail of 3 Augustpublished a photograph of a whole London street filled with young Germans cheering for war. Meanwhile the same sort of crowds of Socialists and Pacifists who have recently been parading London shouting for war with Germany were then agitating for non-resistance to German aggression.
Even when the grey legions of Germany were marching through Belgium and Flanders on their way to these shores, the Socialists held meetings of protest against national defence, and the reluctance to fight engendered by their propaganda proved a serious check to recruiting.
All this when we were at war with an autocracy headed by an Emperor with a ruling caste of Junkers to whom Socialism in any form was abhorrent! This anti-patriotic campaign was maintained throughout the War and the fifteen years that followed it. Indeed, towardsespecially after Mr.
For, as all well-informed people in this country were aware, the spirit of militarism had not been crushed in Germany. Military associations were openly drilling, secret societies aiming at a war of revenge were formed, stores of ammunition were being secretly piled up. All this was shown in my Surrender of an Empire in against which a boycott was organised in the Press. On this occasion a German had been invited to speak, and be held forth at great length on the grievances of Germany, observing that, although he himself was not a Nazi, Nazi-ism was but the natural outcome of German resentment at the policy of disarmament imposed on Germany by the Allies.
This was received with sympathy by the audience, a member of which rose at the end of the address and said: Not one person in that crowded hall rose to observe that we had just scrapped a number of cruisers and were disarming – as is now generally admitted – to the point of danger. Now, today a leading official of that same association is trumpeting an appeal for an increased national defence against the German menace!
If Germany at the present time considers she has grievances, and that the Treaty of Versailles should be scrapped in favour of a policy more in accord with calm judgment and altered circumstances, how can she be blamed by those who formerly encouraged her to think she geramny greater grievances than those she now puts forward?
Either they were wrong then or they are wrong now; in either case we should not be guided by their opinion. Now we — who were never pro-Germans in the sense of seeking peace at any price and of endangering the security wngland our own country, but who held, on the contrary, that in view of the disturbed state of Europe we must remain fully armed wesbter nevertheless recognised that many errors had been made in the Peace Treaties.
It is clear that the policy of forcing Germany with the sword at her throat to admit war guilt, and the absurdity of incorporating the Covenant of the League of Nations in the Treaty of Versailles, could never lead to lasting peace. What happened to bring about their change of front?
The accession of Hitler to power. Now Hitler had in the past shown himself, at moments, as a fire- brand. It certainly seemed to ejgland so in the case of Hitler, who, once in control of his webstee, abandoned his aggressive attitude toward the Allies. But englwnd the same time he put down Bolshevism and took the control of Germany out of the hands of the Jews.
By these measures it was not only Germany that profited but the two greatest dangers to our country were removed.
The floods of Bolshevist propaganda nesha from Berlin into hermany parts of the British Empire were checked at their source. The resentment of the German people towards the Allies as the cause of all their sufferings gave way to passionate enthusiasm for a leader who set out to restore their country by constructive methods.
The old Pan-German dream of world power was replaced englnad a Nationalist scheme for the union of all German peoples under one head, leaving the peoples of other countries to work out their own destinies. Then was the moment for the ending of war hates and of peace between the nation which, throughout thirteen years of endless congresses and assemblies, had been the ebgland aim of European statesmen, of the talkers at Geneva and countless Pacifist associations.
Then was the moment for the whole civilized world, which for fifteen years had been tossed on the waves of unrest set in motion by Moscow, to see in Hitler, as it should have seen in Mussolini, a saviour from the greatest enemy of the human race – the hideous system of tyranny which threatened to spread itself into every country, well stigmatized by Mr.
Instead of this Hitler was reviled, as Mussolini had been reviled after he had saved Italy from the grip of the Red octopus. Such is the power of the Press, and of mass hypnotism exercised over the minds of the British public that they were now made to regard Hitler as their mortal enemy. Yet in the place of an autocratic Emperor at the head of a military caste and of a warlike German nation, we were faced by a ruler who, although a dictator, represents the will of 90 per cent of the population, a plain man of the people, an ardent social reformer, too Socialistic for us but clearly sincere, a leader who whilst restoring the confidence gerjany self-respect of the German people has quelled in them the spirit of hatred towards our country.
Instead of young Germans cheering for war in the streets of London we have had the youth of Germany cheering Mr. Chamberlain as the messenger of peace through the streets of Munich. The expression in reality was singularly apt neeta indicated no hostility to the British people, but conveyed advice that many of germmany would be glad germamy see laid to heart by our politicians.