Building Highly Scalable Servers with Java NIO (4 messages) Developing a fully functional router based on I/O multiplexing was not simple. : Building Highly Scalable Servers with Java NIO multiplexing is significantly harder to understand and to implement correctly. use the NIO API (ByteBu ers, non-blocking I/O) The classical I/O API is very easy Java NIO Framework was started after Ron Hitchen’s presentation How to Build a Scalable Multiplexed Server With NIO at the JavaOne Conference [26].

Author: Meztirn Yozshuhn
Country: Norway
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 4 February 2015
Pages: 292
PDF File Size: 18.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.83 Mb
ISBN: 430-8-67072-193-7
Downloads: 52629
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mak

How to implement an echo web server with reactor pattern in Java?

Understanding Reactor Pattern for Highly Scalable I/O Bound Web Server

Why sfrver reactor pattern come with JavaScript ubild Node. To answer these questions, let us first look at how an HTTP request is handled in general.

After accepting the incoming request, the server establishes a TCP connection. It reads and parses the content in the request from the socket CPU bound. Then the request is dispatched to the application level for domain-specific logics, which would probably visit the file system for data. Once finished, the server writes the response to the client, and waits for the next request, or closes the connection.

Think about switching electric current vs. Bad news for us! We should exhaust them! After all, we can still revisit the status or results later. It looks quite straightforward in JavaScript as shown above, but how is it implemented under the hood? Intuition told me it was manually done by the application developers with threads, but I was wrong.

Actually, there are various ways to do this — different programming languages have their own libraries e.


And the operating systems themselves also provide system calls in the kernel level — e. To handle web requests, there are two competitive web architectures — thread-based one and event-driven one. Nowadays Apache-MPM prefork still retains the feature for the following reasons. It is appropriate for sites that need to multipleexed threading for compatibility with non-thread-safe libraries.

Building Highly Scalable Servers with Java NIO (O’Reilly) []

It is also the best MPM for isolating each request, so that a problem with a single request will not affect any other. However, the isolation and thread-safety come at a price.

Processes are too heavyweight with slower context-switching and memory-consuming. Therefore, the thread-per-connection approach comes into being for better scalability, though programming with threads is error-prone and scalbale. The dispatcher nuild on the socket for new connections and offers them to the bounded blocking queue. Connections exceeding the limitation of the queue will be dropped, but latencies for accepted connections become predictable.

A pool of threads poll the queue for incoming requests, and then process and respond.

Apache-MPM worker takes advantages of both processes and threads threadpool. Scalahle using threads to serve requests, it is able to serve a large number of requests with fewer system resources than a process-based server. However, it retains much of the stability of a process-based server by keeping multiple processes available, each with many threads. Unfortunately, there is always a one-to-one relationship between connections and threads.

Long-living connections like Keep-Alive connections give rise to a large number of worker threads waiting in the idle state for whatever it is slow, e. In addition, hundreds or even thousands of concurrent threads can sccalable a great deal of stack space in the memory.


The reactor pattern is one implementation technique of the event-driven architecture. Events are like incoming a new connection, ready for read, ready for write, etc.

Building Highly Scalable Servers with Java NIO (O’Reilly)

Talk is cheap and show me the code: You can also try to build with Netty, a NIO client server framework. In the following code, a single boss thread is in an event loop blocking on a selector, which is registered with several channels and handlers. Associated handlers will no executed by the boss thread for specific events accept, read, write operations coming from those channels. In terms of processing the request, a threadpool is still used.

Yay, it is server-side JavaScript! Here comes the question – why it is JavaScript with powerful Node. The answer may be as simple as just one single word — tradition.

JavaScript has a tradition of being single threaded though it has limited web worker API. Its concurrency model is based on an event loop. In this world, if you want your APIs to be popular, you have to make them async and non-blocking. As to C async programing with async and await keywords, that is nnio story.

Here is a simple implementation with a threadpool for connections: Reactor Pattern The reactor pattern is one implementation technique of the event-driven architecture.

This pattern decouples modular application-level code from reusable reactor implementation. Acceptor, selected when a new connection incomes.

References C10k problem, http: