View all 2 copies of Il montaggio nella storia del cinema. Tecniche, forme, funzioni from US$ del cinema. Tecniche, forme, funzioni. Federico Vitella . Il montaggio nella storia del cinema: tecniche, forme, funzioni / Federico Vitella. By Federico Vitella. Il montaggio nella storia del cinema: tecniche, forme. Nel a Copenaghen Lars von Trier, Thomas Vinterberg, Søren Nouvelle Vague, New American Cinema, Nuovo Cinema Tedesco, Film Group . e viola sistematicamente le regole del montaggio classico come la regola dei La prevedibilità (drammaturgia) è divenuta il vitello d’oro attorno al quale noi danziamo.
|Published (Last):||24 June 2010|
|PDF File Size:||14.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up. Researching Women in Silent Cinema: New Findings and Perspectives. Published by the Department of the Arts at the University of Bologna, it is issued under the conditions of both open publishing and blind peer review.
It will host collections, monographs, translations of open source archive materials, illustrated volumes, transcripts of conferences, and more. Proposals are welcomed for both media studies, visual studies, photography and new media.
New Findings and Perspectives Edited by: New Findings and Perspectives Peer Review Statement This publication has been edited through a blind peer review process. Papers from the Sixth Women and the Silent Screen Conference University of Bologna,a biennial event sponsored by Women and Film History International, were read by the editors and then submitted to at least one anonymous reviewer.
When the opinion anonymous reviewer. In case of a second negative opinion the essay was rejected. When further changes were by the reviewers. Pioniere del cinema italiano, Lucia Tralli is a Ph.
Her main research focus is the re-use of media images in audiovisual productions. She received her MA in with a thesis about Fontaine. She is now writing her thesis on contemporary forms of audiovisual remixes, focusing especially on fan vidding and gender related issues in remix practices. Women and Cinematic Change from the Silent Era to Now A Collective Endeavor This volume is a partial account of the more than one hundred papers that were presented at the sixth Women and the Silent Screen conference, held in Bologna in Less than reduction is obviously due to the need to keep the editorial work within a manageable scale, Yet these are not the only reasons.
As with previous conferences, several more contributions richness and vitality of our present collective research as the papers we have collected. We cannot speak of our community without acknowledging the hard work and effort that of maturity.
New Findings and Perspectives emerges in dialogue not only with previous conferences but with their related publications as well. We might articulate quite different interests, methods, and projects, but we certainly stand up together in support of our shared endeavors.
Our organization of material was made a posteriori Three Essays on Indeterminacy, Fluidity, and Difference All of our three keynote articles are especially focused on the s, sometimes moving discussion into the s. Nielsen achieved global notoriety because of the nuance and depth of her gestural expression; it was her body that conveyed even the slightest intonation. The Phelps Sisters positing these women as producers of a heterotopian archive that we can unpack today.
From National Cinemas to Comparative Histories yet in fact we learn about an array of other subjects. There is the birth control campaign in the United States Martin F. For some scholars, it is the awareness of an indeterminate gap that motivates historical research itself. Our articles harness a rich variety of materials in their analyses: Browers expands her argument to include nineteenth century discourses and rhetorical traditions, such as those represented by conduct books and sentimental Victorian literature.
On the one hand, she is focusing on German bourgeois society at the opening of the twentieth we all presume to know: As she explains, the coincidence between the emergence of narrative cinema, the female actress on screen, and our own agency as women who negotiate public and private spaces, can not be taken for granted. This is certainly the reason why in Researching Women in Silent Cinema this period emerges as such a rich ground of inquiry, which extends in each and every direction, and even as our crucial theoretical and historical resting point.
However, there is another major reason why we all seem to recognize the s as such of our collective emancipation, yet it contains within it our collective conservatism.
Our challenge today is to join both histories in discussion and research. Can we do this? Authors have proposed tentative paths forward, indicating that the sources we read are implicated in this process of re-thinking history and our place in it.
We would do well to remember this, the discourse it devolved, that saw our emancipation. The indeterminacy that so many of contingency might just be other ways of expressing our historical emancipation. She is the author of the award winning book [shattered Memoires Memorie di una pioniera del cinema Non solo dive.
Pioniere del cinema italiano [not just divas: She has published broadly in early Cinema Ritrovato, Bologna, and been involved in Women and the Silent Screen since its founding in Utrecht, Research interests include feminist historiography, History Fed By Fiction: Works Cited Bean, Jennifer M.
Bean and Diane Negra. Duke University Press, Bean, Jennifer M, and Diane Negra, eds. A Feminist Reader in Early Cinema. Women in Cinema Before Sound. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Hastie, Amelie, and Shelley Stamp, eds.
Women and the Silent Screen.
Film Analysis (A-L) / — School of Arts, Humanities, and Cultural Heritage
Gledhill, Christine, and Julia Knight. University of Illinois Press, forthcoming. Maule, Rosanna, and Catherine Russell, eds. At the and not least as actresses, something that is not identical with the function of stars, shaped by men. It argues that the actress places the reality of perceptual play in a public space. Thanks to her, a form of communal life that the women formed in and with the home is freed from the walls of the private. But most of all, this was about the audience: In this account, it was with their support that the Mulvey or Claire Johnston.
Of course these women equally contributed to the discovery of and research on this early, other cinema. For here, a zone of transition is eliminated in favor of a dichotomy. But the phase of transition is quite interesting from a feminist perspective. It was here mass audience. And the transition, the multiple transitions, in a given period of time thus become the actual object of research for early cinema. The Intermediate In contrast to a dichotomous thinking about a theory of the early cinema, I would like to 2 See also: Abstracting from this research implies that Nielsen is only a mirror of the cinema of the s, a special phenomenon in which its emanations are bundled and establish themselves—always shaped by contemporary interests.
The cinema of attractions turn, the phase of the formation of cinema, corresponds to current efforts to preserve institution formed by economic and power interests. Cinema Theory For me—and not only for me—the discovery of the early cinema provided an impulse critique of the Hollywood cinema seemed a strong motivation. The more I concerned women constitutively participated in the emergence of the cinema.
It was also clear that this participation found no echo in the press—or if it did, it was a negative one. For cinema theorists, the cinema could no longer be subsumed under the theoretical concept of a public institution.
From my own experience, and with an eye on the s, it proved to be an intermediate factor, a mediation between publicity and intimacy.
There is, I would like to argue, a movement of emancipation concealed here. On the one hand disappointed, it also inspired me to present my own view of the matter. One such inspiration was his reference to cultural paradigms and series. He recognized that women were indeed capable of all the cultural production that was developed by men and had been female culture. He considered two phenomena. Simmel saw the other in the actress, something I will return to later.
It seems plausible to conceive of the cinema of the s within the paradigm of the feminine culture of the Haus. At issue were spaces run by private male individuals that nevertheless found public interest. These spaces female audience, montabgio would not have spent their time drl the cinema, or for many reasons they would have spent much less time there.
There is evidence of how frequently women encouraged men to attend the cinema, and how men were more interested in the female guaranteed the respectability of the location.
On the one hand, female cinemagoers were part of the basic arrangement. At the same time, the women on the screen provided the spectator with dreams and fantasies that corresponded to their most intimate desires. This cinema as a cinema of the. For the is the cinema itself.
For this reason, I will now turn to the actress. The Actress The culture of the Haus and the art of the actress were closely linked even before the cinema combined them. For Simmel, they are both forms of female culture.
In this conception of the Haus and the actress, the philosopher of culture subverts the bourgeois subjection of women to the separation between private and public.
In the one sphere, they were considered socially recognized women, but in the other—and this is entirely true of the actresses—they were basically considered prostitutes. The cinema continued in practice this theoretical subversion in the concept of a female culture comprising the home and stage, and abolished the separation between private and public.
The woman that goes to the cinema leaves aside the seriousness of the patriarchal, social function of her ddel, what remains is also an ability to play. I will go into this capacity in more detail below.
First of all, however, the statement that women are productively joined around culture or core of the Haus in play corresponds neither to then contemporary views nor to more recent feminist research. Does that mean that my attempt at a historiography of the must in the end do without an alliance with theory?