6 Men only 5 Takhøe val LEY Law JR 38 so 00 || 4 03 66 TR in Idad HD CG 41 03 09 58 72–73 5 unk TRUCKEE. 3 MAS LEY HOT SPRINGS YUKON VALLEY 1 1 65 00 39 23 22 AIRPORT HEX INC SO 65 37 03 9 13 13 WH1TTIO PACIFIC. eO * I 12 35 03 81 7*1 . Mr. snd Mrs. N C. Co he ley, of leave in a few da>s for her home in.
|Published (Last):||12 September 2006|
|PDF File Size:||8.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Operative part of the order. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of their action, the Applicants argue that: This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website.
NEOOC – Snow-O – February 3, 2018
Page 1 of April 11th, Banco Mare Nostrum S. April 2nd, Fruhmann, acting as Agent Operative part of the judgment The Court: On the contrary, in such a situation it falls to the holders of the claims to choose to be compensated by one or other of the schemes laid down in national law to implement those two directives.
Fourth plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of proportionality The recovery of the entire amount can only be used as a measure of last resort in certain exceptional circumstances, which are not present in the instant case. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy. Herrmann, acting as Agents Re: Skip to main content. First plea in law, alleging breach of the fundamental principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination:.
Expand all Collapse all. Originally Posted by Romana-boy.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
First plea in law, alleging breach of the fundamental principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The application for interim measures is rejected. Those provisions do not have direct effect, but it is for the national court to give an interpretation of national procedural law which, to the fullest extent possible, is consistent with them.
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of the right to a fair hearing The applicant complains that a premature definitive decision was reached, despite it being known that, without fault of the applicant, it was objectively impossible on the date of the decision for the documents proving appropriate use of funds to be submitted. April 6th, Proyectos en otras Provincias RD: Tovar Gomis, acting as Agents Intervener in support of the defendant: University lej Koblenz-Landau Mainz, Germany represented by: Find More Posts 166-3 Romana-boy.
Use the Advanced search.
European Ombudsman represented by: Warsaw, Poland represented by: EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case 1660-3. The Miches sustainable development project encompasses a wide range of 166–03 and community projects, including reforestation, cleaning polluted water sources, and a micro-hydro project for electricity generation using existing natural resources and without altering the environment.
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. In support of their action, the applicants take the view that the Commission has an obligation under EU law to remedy the situation.
EUR-Lex – CFULL – EN – EUR-Lex
Find More Posts by Jaru Work was started on the project last June. FF Group Romania shall bear its own costs.
Finnish Referring court Korkein hallinto-oikeus Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: